Lectures

Lecture: "The process by which the notes of the lecturer become the notes of the student without passing through the mind of either"

The lecture is still the standard teaching event in higher education—although nowhere else—and thus an illustration of Atherton's law, "The amount of attention paid to teaching and learning is in inverse proportion to the perceived ability of the students."

For once, there is a standard text in the field. Bligh (6th edn. 2000) may tell you more than you ever wanted to know, but it is very clear and well laid out for skimming by busy academics. It includes 23 pages of references, in double columns and 8-point text: admittedly, some of them relate to dubious research on the memorisation of nonsense syllables, but he has covered all the angles.

These notes are unduly dogmatic, but read Bligh for background.

Use

Lectures are relatively effective for conveying information, but—unsurprisingly—not for developing skills or changing attitudes. Used in conjunction with other methods, such as set reading, seminars and student presentations, they can provide a useful overview of a field and help students to make sense of their other work.

Attending a lecture is a passive experience for the student. Of all teaching events, the lecture is most likely to promote basic assumption dependence and sleep. Note-taking is up to the students, their level of motivation and their skill, so—

Signposting

It is useful—nay, vital—to enable the students to appreciate the shape of the argument. The biggest single problem with note-taking is not appreciating the level of the point which is being made. Lectures unfold over time, and students do not always know whether what they are listening to is a major substantive point, its elaboration, or a gloss or even digression. You can signpost aurally—"The next major issue to consider is ..." —but an outline presented visually and returned to at appropriate points is much more effective. A gapped handout serves much the same purpose.

Attention

Bligh's evidence suggests a fairly steady decline in student attention (and lecturer performance) from the start to the end of a traditional one-hour (50 minute) lecture. Students blip upwards about 10-15 minutes before the end, but this has little effect if the lecturer continues to go downhill. He suggests that the limit to students' effective attention is 25-30 minutes. I think that may be optimistic, and in any case there is no point in going up to the wire.

Attention span in lectures
(claimed—it is not clear what constitutes the y axis scale)

The good news is that even half a minute's respite has beneficial effects, and that a change is almost as good as a rest. So

• inviting questions
• posing a simple multiple-choice question, answered by a show of hands
• setting a simple exercise for buzz groups

or anything else which varies the pace may produce the desired result.

Notional effect of interruptions on attention

↑ Top

Rehearsal

A relatively rapid rehearsal of the content can make a considerable difference to retention. A seminar or lab session immediately following the lecture is perhaps the best way to achieve this —and "Any questions?" with two minutes to go, probably the worst (apart from not inviting any questions at all).

Posing a question for the students (or providing an example sheet to be worked through before the next session) should leave them thinking—but it is important that this is not merely an empty exercise and that it is given value at the start of the next lecture (even if it is only the "swots" who address it).

↑ Top